<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.green.tv &#187; health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.green.tv/blog/tag/health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.green.tv</link>
	<description>green.tv blog and community space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Biodiversity v GM, or both?</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/biodiversity-gm-kew-millennium-seed-project/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/biodiversity-gm-kew-millennium-seed-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kew Gardens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Bigger Picture: Festival of Interdependence on Saturday last, Colin Tudge (author Feeding People is Easy) explains how important something like Kew’s Millennium Seed Bank Project is:
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/biodiversity-gm-kew-millennium-seed-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Young British Green Bloggers: blogging the transition</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/young-british-green-bloggers-blogging-the-transition/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/young-british-green-bloggers-blogging-the-transition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[greenblogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenliving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young british green bloggers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The green-blogosphere is US centric.  But who’s out there that homegrown British? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/young-british-green-bloggers-blogging-the-transition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Environment Agency versus Panorama: Whose side are you on?</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/environment-agency-versus-bbc-panorama/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/environment-agency-versus-bbc-panorama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenliving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panorama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe beaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Panorama reported on "Britain's Dirty Beaches." The Environment Agency disagrees and we've got their rebuttal: ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/environment-agency-versus-bbc-panorama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too many climate campaigns?</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/too-many-climate-change-campaigns/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/too-many-climate-change-campaigns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 07:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DECC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxfam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Miliband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[green.tv has featured campaigns by all of our partners and some non-partners soliciting action on climate change-- from signing petitions to convince government leaders that they should not leave the Cop15  without a deal to individual action campaigns.  And yet, we still aren’t doing enough. What’s the point of all these campaigns?  Are there too many that we have now become saturated with climate change that we have been spurred past action to continued inaction?   Has anything really changed?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/too-many-climate-change-campaigns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Water Week&#8211; the Stockholm Statement, just hot air?</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/08/world-water-week-stockholm-statement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/08/world-water-week-stockholm-statement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UNEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cop15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenliving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[World Water Week from Stockholm:  are you thinking what can be more boring and ineffectual than a room full of officials agreeing to agree to manage water and sanitation better?  Well actually, the end result, the Stockholm Statement, is worth shouting from the rooftops about. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/08/world-water-week-stockholm-statement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

