<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.green.tv &#187; water</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.green.tv/blog/tag/water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.green.tv</link>
	<description>green.tv blog and community space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The New Food Panic: Scientists Call for Green Revolution 2.0 &amp; FoE says No!</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/the-new-food-panic-scientists-call-for-green-revolution-2-0-foe-says-no/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/the-new-food-panic-scientists-call-for-green-revolution-2-0-foe-says-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FoE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it looks like world maybe headed for a second green revolution. None the least to do with the Royal Society for Agriculture’s new study that calls for £2 billion for R&#38;D over the next decade. A new study from the International Food Policy Research Institute (find link Nelson et al) forecasts future crop yields based upon the IPCCs second worst scenario is 1.6 degree Celsius average rise in global temperatures combined with two climate change weather pattern models (NCAR &#38; CSIRO).  But Kew Gardens and Friends of the Earth both argue for biodiversity instead. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/10/the-new-food-panic-scientists-call-for-green-revolution-2-0-foe-says-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Environment Agency versus Panorama: Whose side are you on?</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/environment-agency-versus-bbc-panorama/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/environment-agency-versus-bbc-panorama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenliving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panorama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe beaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Panorama reported on "Britain's Dirty Beaches." The Environment Agency disagrees and we've got their rebuttal: ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/environment-agency-versus-bbc-panorama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kathmandu to Cop15 &amp;&#8230; India</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/kathmandu-to-cop15-india/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/kathmandu-to-cop15-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate refugees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cop15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Monday and Tuesday this week countries of the Himalayan region met in Nepal to agree a regional consensus for the Climate Change talks in December. Afghanistan, Bangladesh, the Maldives, Nepal, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka all participated.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/09/kathmandu-to-cop15-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Water Week&#8211; the Stockholm Statement, just hot air?</title>
		<link>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/08/world-water-week-stockholm-statement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/08/world-water-week-stockholm-statement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>annied</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UNEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cop15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenliving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.green.tv/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[World Water Week from Stockholm:  are you thinking what can be more boring and ineffectual than a room full of officials agreeing to agree to manage water and sanitation better?  Well actually, the end result, the Stockholm Statement, is worth shouting from the rooftops about. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.green.tv/blog/2009/08/world-water-week-stockholm-statement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

